In a 24 hour world, where the bottom line is key, freelance writer Babu Basu asks, “Should we make time for manners?”
Cash is king they tell me, and they’d be right.
At one point or another, all entrepreneurs have lost sleep worrying about liquidity. Assets are useful, staff are supportive, but cash… cash is the Swiss army knife in an entrepreneur’s inventory. With a million and one uses, money is of major importance, but should it be our only concern?
Some would say I’m being naive, but I believe that manners and decency should take equal billing.
Firms need to think about the impact their activities have on the rest of the world. In carrying out those activities, staff need to think about manners and their effect on people they work with.
The manners?
There was a time when we used to say, “Manners maketh the man”. How you behaved was a mark of the person you were.
The UK population was famed for its good manners. Jokes were made about it. Watch National Lampoons European Vacation and you’ll see Brits apologising when other people tread on their feet, or crash into their car.
How things have changed.
According to an article written by Murray Wardrop, from The Telegraph dated December 2008, Britons are “becoming ruder than ever as our lives become more stressful and hectic.”
I wonder, are companies too focused on the financials, massacring our manners? Is the emphasis on the ‘here and now’ damaging our ‘going forward’?
But don’t just blame business. Have a look our failing education system.
Things have worsened with the rise in texting and the fall in literacy rates. With a limited grasp of language, are we restricting the emotional intelligence of our workforce and their ability to express themselves?
On the whole, limited literacy restricts a population’s ability to be inspired by great works of literature, or appreciate incredible works of art. Could this also be leading to the ‘dumbing down’ of society? As a nation, this is something we really cannot afford.
As a people, we need to be polite.
Politeness ‘v’ Over-formality
Politeness should not be confused with over-formality. Over-formality is not polite, it is cold, stuffy and ineffective.
Politeness is friendliness in word and deed. It is opening a door for a stranger, or saying thank you to someone who has served you. Politeness is communicating your pleasure or displeasure in an appropriately assertive tone.
As a man with more than 10 years in customer service, I’ve read my share of complaints letters. In the vast majority of cases, the most effective letters were polite. Build empathy with your reader and they’ll help you more effectively.
Corporate Good Manners
You could argue that CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) is the 21st Century equivalent of good manners for business. Firms are becoming more aware of their impact on society, but I wonder, are people within those firms being polite to each other?
As a writer, I see rudeness every day. Emails are a prime example.
Instead of using the polite, “Can you?” or saying “Please”, or, “Do you mind” emails are swamped with “I need”, “Send me” “You must”
Now, you might think that I’m being over sensitive, but rudeness affects the bottom line.
A thoughtless email, sent to ‘hurry things along’ can actually be counter-productive. Time and again, I’ve seen staff become angry and instantly de-motivated because of the tone of an ill worded email.
Emails are instant, easily accessible and dangerous.
When you speak to someone on the phone you can hear their tone. You can usually determine their emotional state of mind. Angry, sad, sincere or tongue in cheek, you can usually gauge how the speaker feels.
With emails, the absence of a spoken tone makes gauging the emotional tone far harder.
Emails have another danger – they can be sent to other people – instantly. When advising others about sending tricky emails I apply The Watch Dog Test.
The Watch Dog Test
In a business setting, people should write only what they are comfortable sharing. Would you, for example, be comfortable if your email was sent to the consumer affairs programme Watch Dog, or used as evidence in a Court of Law? If not, don’t send it.
Talk to the Hand
I know I’m not the only one to see decency decline. In her fantastic book, ‘Talk to the Hand’ (half rant, half novel) Lynne Truss laments the decline of modern day manners. Her comedic rage struck a chord with many – 3 million people to be exact.
If I’ve struck a chord with you, then drop me a line.
Please and thank you.
Texts and emails cause more friction between people than any other form of communication – simply because they are often not given enough thought.
People say things in texts and emails that they would never commit to paper, or say to the person’s face. Also, how many times have you heard of an (embarrassing) email being sent to the wrong person? (Ouch!)
As a lawyer who likes to use plain English, I certainly wouldn’t want to see a return to the over-formality you refer to, but I do believe that the ’send’ key should come with a government health warning.
Time is precious to us all, but where the message is important or sensitive, I find it’s always best to pick up the ‘phone. (Oh, and you know what they say: Smile before you say ‘Hello’ – The other party will hear it in your voice!)
Hi Margaret.
Your words of wisdom have made me smile.
I have certainly been guilty of sending the right email to the wrong person :O
Apparently, in emails and on the net, we say things we wouldn’t normally say as supposedly, we are in a ‘consequence free environment’. I learnt that such an environment does not exist.
Like the idea of the Government health warning. I wonder where I can apply for one
Nice article, all well put.
I personally find it distracting for people to point to texting as a reason for poor literacy – language is taught/learnt before mobiles are used. People point at technology as being the enemy when the problem is in the teaching.
At some point there was a shift in both formal education, and also the attitudes of parents, that has led to the combination of falling literacy standards and general civility to other human beings.
What caused that shift is a much bigger argument. Let’s just say that I personally believe there is such a thing as society. http://thinkexist.com/quotation/there_is_no_such_thing_as_society-there_are/167851.html
Thank you Paul.
I think you’re right. It’s easy to blame technology. We should be focusing on how to improve our educational system.
It worries me that there are still many in the UK who have not attained a basic level of literacy.
It was nice to see your blog.Just Keep Writing!
Thanks Paul,
Will do!
Dear Paul,
Do you really think that children are ‘taught language’ before mobiles are used? This does not seem to be the case in most primary schools, where even the youngest children seem to have a mobile these days!
Seriously, I share your and Babu’s concerns about literacy standards, but then again, what would Chaucer make of even the best of today’s English?
Time moves on.
I personally have reservations about teaching methods which ‘concentrate upon the ability to communicate rather than grammar’ – as my daughter’s German teacher told me, when I asked why still she had no clear idea about cases and endings in her GCSE year! Nevertheless, I have no doubt that the English language in 100 years time will have incorporated much of the ‘text speak’ and spellings which some of us find so disturbing today.
For me, therefore, the real issue is that whatever form of the language we use, there is no reason not to be polite about it!
Thank you, thank you! It’s interesting that others are experiencing, and writing about, the “fading of politeness.”
Rudeness seems to be seeping into society more frequently these days. Used to be that lack of manners, in a world filled with more common courtesy, was something that stood out like a sore thumb.
But that was then, and this is now. Today, it’s often just the opposite: it’s the kind, polite behavior and small acts of common courtesy that cause me to do double takes (did that person really just say, “thank you”? Someone, pinch me!).
Thanks again for a great article.
Thank you Jennifer,
Absolutely!
Nowadays, good manners stand out a mile, mainly because they are so rare.
I wonder if in our need to be P.C., we’ve become too scared to be courteous.
For example, some men have become scared to hold doors open for women because they are worried the women are patronised or offended. Indeed, I have seen some women take offence. However, I would suggest that in the vast majority of cases, women (and men) would appreciate someone opening doors for them.
I think if someone is ‘patronised’ because of your good manners, it is their problem, not yours and you should carry on as you were.
[Babu steps off his soap box
]